Definition: And the rest of the acts of Amaziah, [are] they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 14:18. It's a little tricky, but it essentially means this: “The rest of Amaziah’s actions – everything he did during his reign – aren’t part of the official record of the kings of Judah.” Here’s a breakdown of what that suggests: Amaziah was King: This verse refers to a king named Amaziah, who ruled in Judah (a region in Israel). “Acts of Amaziah” : It’s talking about all the things Amaziah did while he was king. “Not Written in the Chronicles” : The "chronicles" are like a historical record – a list of important events and rulers. This suggests that these actions weren't formally documented or recorded as part of the official history of Judah. What does this tell us about it? It’s suggesting that Amaziah might have been a very wealthy and powerful king, but perhaps he wasn't particularly noteworthy in terms of historical record. It could be hinting at some kind of secret wealth or influence he had that wasn't fully revealed to the rest of the kingdom. Important Note: It’s crucial to understand this verse within its context – it's part of a larger story about the succession and power struggles in ancient Israel. --- Do you want me to explain anything else about this verse? For example, would you like me to: Explain what "chronicles" were in ancient times? Discuss the significance of wealth and power in ancient Judah?